USPTO serial 74377165
ULTRAMUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAMUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Weston, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE, PCEIGHTH FL1100 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations; namely, an immunosuppressant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |