USPTO serial 74378084
CARPET EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARPET EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
GRANT R CLAYTONTHORPE N & WESTERN9035 S 700 E STE 200SANDY, UT 84070Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motor vehicle carpet and upholstery cleaning equipment; namely, soil extraction systems featuring cleaning solution recycling, sold only directly to, and for use by, professional motor vehicle washing and detailing establishments and not for retail sale to the public or for residential use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |