Drawing for CARPET EXPRESS

USPTO serial 74378084

CARPET EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HORRALL, PATRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARPET EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant R. Clayton

GRANT R CLAYTONTHORPE N & WESTERN9035 S 700 E STE 200SANDY, UT 84070

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009motor vehicle carpet and upholstery cleaning equipment; namely, soil extraction systems featuring cleaning solution recycling, sold only directly to, and for use by, professional motor vehicle washing and detailing establishments and not for retail sale to the public or for residential useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 17, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 10, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 17, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance