Drawing for ARROW

USPTO serial 74380008

ARROW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANVILLE, ANNA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARROW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barth X. deRosa

BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006tracking of metal or primarily of metalABANDONED—
007electric motorsABANDONED—
009tracking and conveying systems; remote control apparatus; computerised control systems and apparatusABANDONED—
037design, construction and installation services, in particular of truss and suspension systems, scaffolding, stages and sets, rigging equipment, moving systems; hire of truss and rigging equipment and lifting gearABANDONED—
042design, construction and installation services, in particular of truss and suspension systems, scaffolding, stages and sets, rigging equipment, moving systems; hire of truss and rigging equipment and lifting gearABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance