USPTO serial 74380681
THE ECOLOGICAL CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ECOLOGICAL CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESSE M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | recycled papers; namely, recycled printing and writing papers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |