USPTO serial 74380932
FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Kegan
DANIEL KEGAN KEGAN & KEGAN, LTD79 W MONROE #1320CHICAGO, IL 60603-4969UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | mail order services for vitamin and mineral supplements, cosmetics, jewelry, wallets, housewares, kitchen accessories, health aids, clothing accessories | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1975 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 29, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |