USPTO serial 74383979
CPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 1B1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy Machaalany
Roy Machaalany Flansberry Menard and Associates208-4275 Innes Rd.Ottawa, Ontario, K1C1T1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software program including instructions manuals and hardware | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |