USPTO serial 74384423
POSITIVE IMAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 1994
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POSITIVE IMAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toms River, NJ
Toms River, NJ
Toms River, NJ
Toms River, NJ
Toms River, NJ
Toms River, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Zielinski
ROBERT L ZIELINSKI WOLF BLOCK SCHORR & SOLIS-COHEN LLP1650 ARCH ST22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2097Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | orthotic and prosthetic medical apparatuses, namely ankle, foot and knee orthosis and braces; thoracic, cervical and spinal braces; fracture braces and joint supports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 16, 1993 |
| 040 | custom manufacture of orthotics and prosthetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 16, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scarnati, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Scarnati, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Ruscito, Joseph L.
- Other trademarks owned by Scarnati, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Ruscito, Joseph L.
- Other trademarks owned by Ruscito, Joseph L.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named POSITIVE IMAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |