USPTO serial 74385356
TOBY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODPASTER, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOBY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard R. Fine
HENRY S KAPLAN ROCKEY, RIFKIN AND RYTHERTWO FIRST NATIONAL PLZ20 S CLARK ST STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | soft plush toy animal with electronic components which enable the toy to interact with specially encoded television and videotape broadcasts, such interaction being in the form of physical movements and audible responses | ABANDONED | Aug 30, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |