Drawing for SEATTLE SERIES

USPTO serial 74385775

SEATTLE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEATTLE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randel S. Springer

RANDEL S SPRINGER WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCONE W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036credit card servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 1, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 29, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 19, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 11, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 7, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 7, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 6, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 26, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 8, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1994IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jul 1, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 3, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 2, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance