USPTO serial 74387089
HIGHTOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGHTOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marnie Wright Barnhorst
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST GRAY, CARY, AMES & FRYE1700 FIRST INTERSTATE PLZ401 "B" STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed material; namely, posters, comic magazines, trading cards and picture booklets | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |