USPTO serial 74387220
COMPUTER SYSTEMS INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPUTER SYSTEMS INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita M.K. Purut
RITA M K PURUT MOORE & VAN ALLEN2200 W MAIN STP O BOX 3843DURHAM, NC 27702-3843Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; visual display units for computers; graphics cards for computers; computer programs; input units of computers; namely, mouses, digitizers, scanners, trackballs, touchpanels and keyboards; output units for computers; namely, CRT display units, printers, plotters, external storage units for computer; namely, hard magnetic discs, hard disc drives, blank floppy discs, blank drives, magnetic tape, memory extension cards, I/O interface cards, modems, and drive controller cards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |