USPTO serial 74387733
MACHO MAN RANDY SAVAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MACHO MAN RANDY SAVAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R. ELLIS
DAVID R ELLIS3233 E BAY DR STE 101LARGO, FL 34641UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video cassettes, audio cassettes, video and audio cassettes featuring a sports entertainment celebrity; compact discs, laser discs and phonograph records featuring a sports entertainment celebrity; cinematograph film featuring a sports entertainment celebrity and computer software featuring a sports entertainment celebrity | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1995 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |