USPTO serial 74388260
CK CALVIN KLEIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CK CALVIN KLEIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC1430 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018-3308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, perfume, night cream, body powder, shampoo, deodorant, body cream, shower gel, cologne, soap, skin moisturizers, body wash, hair conditioner, hair hold, sun screen, bath oil, skin conditioning cream, hand cream, after shave, after shave balm, mousse, styling gel | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |