Drawing for BROWNS

USPTO serial 74388632

BROWNS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHAW, THOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BROWNS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018handbags, wallets and credit card holdersABANDONEDAug 1, 1993
025ladies' and men's footwear and accessories, namely gloves and beltsABANDONEDAug 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 1996ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 15, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 15, 1996OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 3, 1995OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 6, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 1995IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 1, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 1994ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 4, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 24, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance