USPTO serial 74389902
VISION 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISION 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrice C. Scatena
KAREN B CROCKETT GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER333 S GRAND AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90071-3197UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation of local area networks, and computer software (for data management and computer-aided mechanical engineering, design and analysis); providing on-site maintenance services for local area networks, and computer software (for data management and computer-aided mechanical engineering, design and analysis) | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | providing classes and training (on-site) in the use of local area networks, and computer software (for data management and computer-aided mechanical engineering, design, and analysis) | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consultation in the field of computers and computer software; providing on-site and remote error correction services for local area networks, and computer software (for data management and computer-aided mechanical engineering, design and analysis) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Visionary Design Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Visionary Design Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISION 2000
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |