USPTO serial 74390100
LOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN & GROSS230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded phonograph records in the field of music; pre-recorded video and audio cassettes in the field of music; pre-recorded digital compact cassettes in the field of music; pre-recorded digital audio tapes in the field of music; pre-recorded compact discs in the field of music; computer programs in the field of music for use in creating, playing and teaching music | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | posters | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | ornamental novelty buttons and pins | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely T-shirts, sweatshirts and bottoms, jackets, shorts, pants, vests and hats | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | management of entertainment, sports and public figures | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a vocal and/or instrumental group, and an individual | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Riley, Edward T.
- Other trademarks owned by Riley, Edward T.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LOR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |