USPTO serial 74390629
RAD REX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAD REX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micheline Kelly Johnson
MICHELINE KELLY JOHNSON SPEARS, MOORE, REBMAN & WILLIAMSEIGHTH FL BLUE CROSS BLDG801 PINE STCHATTANOOGA, TN 37402Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMITH-HORTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SMITH-HORTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HORTON, EDWARD N., II
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RAD REX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |