Drawing for MFMA

USPTO serial 74391698

MFMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1896682Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 1995
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MFMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean C. Fifield

SEAN C. FIFIELD LOCKE LORD BISSELL & LIDDELL LLP111 S. WACKER DR., SUITE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
Amaple, birch, and beech flooringSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 17, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 8, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 8, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2005RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 14, 200589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 14, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 200589AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Mar 30, 2005E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2001C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 9, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 30, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance