USPTO serial 74391969
SECURACOMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2062434Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 1997
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECURACOMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
KANSAS CITY, MO
Pittsburgh, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory M. Kratofil
Gregory M. Kratofil Polsinelli Shalton Flanigan Suelthaus P.C.700 W. 47th StreetSuite 1000Kansas City, MO 64112Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | security and communications consulting and systems engineering | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ronald S. Libengood
- Other trademarks owned by Ronald S. Libengood
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Ronald S. Libengood
- Other trademarks owned by SECURACOMM CONSULTING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECURACOMM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 20, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 18, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |