Drawing for SMARTLANE

USPTO serial 74392013

SMARTLANE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTLANE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic data terminals, electronic cash registers, telephones, and data communications devices which accept smart cards, credit cards and debit cards and other payment or authorization devices for performing transaction processing, processing and transferring credit and debit card transactions, payments, and other information presented thereto, and for use in retail sales locations and with transaction processing systems, point-of-sale or service systems, and financial transaction information and approval systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 1997EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 1997EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 18, 1996EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 1996EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 26, 1996EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 16, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 15, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance