Drawing for N-SURE

USPTO serial 74392317

N-SURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUNN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with N-SURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry W. Leeds

HENRY W LEEDS TUCKER, FLYER & LEWISSTE 4001615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computerized personal identification and data security equipment - namely, encoded identification cards in the form of smart cards with programmable memories; cryptographic software; controllers - namely, card and readers controller; readers - namely, identificaiton card readers; computers; video cameras; video monitors; card printers; and tape data backup hardware and softwareABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 27, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 15, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance