USPTO serial 74393344
BEHAVIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEHAVIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Fetterley
DANIEL D FETTERLEY ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALLSTE 1100100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | desktop publishing systems comprised of computer boards, computer software, magnetic or optical memory media and drives, data input devices; namely, keyboard or mouse; personal information management systems comprised of computer software, magnetic or optical memory media and drives, printers, modems, scanners; optical character recognition systems comprised of computer boards, computer software, magnetic media and drives, scanners, monitors, data input devices; namely, mouse | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | language translation services; computer programming for others; design of computer hardware and software to order and specification of others; rental of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEHAVIOR TECH COMPUTER CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by BEHAVIOR TECH COMPUTER CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEHAVIOR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |