USPTO serial 74393503
IN THE ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IN THE ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Bennett
RICHARD E BENNETT915 BROADWAY STE 1010NEW YORK, NY 10010-7108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | fragrance; namely, men's aftershave and cologne; women's perfume | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing; namely, T-shirts, sweat shirts, hats, warm-up suits, outerwear, jackets, athletic shorts, sneakers | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | sporting goods; namely, basketballs, volleyballs, water bottles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |