USPTO serial 74394368
REGINA NUT PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2012963Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 5, 1996
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REGINA NUT PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
Brooklyn, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H. Swyers, Esq.
Matthew H. Swyers, Esq. The Trademark Company344 Maple Avenue West PMB 151Vienna, VA 22180UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Regina Nut Products Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Regina Nut Products Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by SAHADI FINE FOODS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Regina Nut Products Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named REGINA NUT PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2017 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |