USPTO serial 74394560
GOLD CUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLD CUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerson E. Meyers
GERSON E MEYERS DRESSLER, GOLDSMITH, SHORE, ET ALTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ180 N STETSON, STE 4700CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | game tables; namely, tables for playing pool, billiards, cards, and parts therefor and components thereof, and other related table and accessory items; namely, billiard cues, cue cases, billiard balls, ball and cue racks, billiard table covers, cloth replacement kits, table repair kits, cue repair kits, cue tip sanders, cue chalk, chalk holders, bridge sticks, talc, talc shake bottles, kelly peas, scorers and triangles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |