USPTO serial 74394886
DR. SEUSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR. SEUSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
La Jolla, CA
San Diego, CA
La Jolla, CA
San Diego, CA
La Jolla, CA
San Diego, CA
La Jolla, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY O DIX
NANCY O DIX GRAY CARE WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of amusement parks, production of animated and live children's interactive television shows, production of animated and live entertainment programs for distribution over cable television and computer networks, and the production and distribution of motion pictures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZoBell, Karl
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by ZoBell, Karl
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Geisel, Audrey S.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Geisel, Audrey S.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DR. SEUSS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |