USPTO serial 74395043
LIFEQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFEQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott K. Haight
SCOTT K HAIGHT HEISKELL, DONELSON, BEARMAN, ET ALFIRST TENNESSEE BLDG165 MADISON AVE TWENTIETH FLMEMPHIS, TN 38103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | health care costs containment and medical costs management services through improved employee wellness and review and consultation related thereto | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | maintaining files and records concerning the medical condition including lifestyle factors, physical measurements and clinical laboratory analysis of individuals and review and consultation related thereto | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Risk Management Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Risk Management Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LIFEQUEST
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |