USPTO serial 74395674
CRISTALRASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRISTALRASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER115 N HENRY STPOST OFFICE BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | typesetting and imagesetting apparatus, raster image processors and screening algorithms for use in electronic publishing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1995 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 18, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |