USPTO serial 74396096
PEDALO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEDALO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
W-7420 Munsingen, DE
W-7420 Munsingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | land sport vehicles, namely bicycles | ABANDONED | Oct 27, 1993 |
| 028 | non-motorized scooters; skateboards; exercise treadmills; toy and exercise carts and wagons; exercise equipment used for movement therapy consisting of wheels, axles, handles, handlebars, foot placement and support boards, and seats; wheeled sports and exercise systems consisting of wheels, axles, and foot placement and support boards able to be assembled into various configurations; and parts and accessories therefore | ABANDONED | Oct 27, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1997 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |