USPTO serial 74396730
VIRTUAL DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUAL DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton L. Lilling
BURTON L LILLING LILLING & LILLING PCP O BOX 560GOLDENS BRIDGE, NY 10526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD-ROM software containing literature, educational and general topic information, games, and interactive computer programs featuring user-controlled narratives | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BYRON PREISS MULTIMEDIA COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BYRON PREISS MULTIMEDIA COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL DOG
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |