Drawing for WINDOW ARMOR

USPTO serial 74397398

WINDOW ARMOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O LEAR, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WINDOW ARMOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel S. Polley

DANIEL S POLLEY MALIN, HALEY, DIMAGGIO AND CROSBYONE E BROWARD BLVD STE 1609FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017window security device; namely, a film which adheres to a window to prevent breakage or damageABANDONEDMar 1, 1993
037installation services for window security devicesABANDONEDMar 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 1995ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 24, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 1995OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance