USPTO serial 74398615
SYLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Murray Schaffer
MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RDMINEOLA, NY 11501-4477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for pneumatically determining volumes in large containers, namely silos and grain elevators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |