USPTO serial 74399119
PENFINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2192436Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 1998
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PENFINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brunnmattstrasse 6 CH-3401 Burgdorf, CH
BURGDORF CH3401, CH
Brunnmattstrasse 6 CH-3401 Burgdorf, CH
Brunnmattstrasse 6 CH-3401 Burgdorf, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Leviton
Joel D. Leviton Stinson Leonard Street LLP150 South 5th Street, Ste 2300Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | drug delivery systems consisting primarily of pens and injectors, including needles, cannulas and other parts thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Disetronic Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by TECPHARMA LICENSING AG
- Other trademarks owned by Disetronic Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Disetronic Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PENFINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |