USPTO serial 74399377
FOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
W-8000 Munchen 40, DE
W-8000 Munchen 40, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morris Liss
MORRIS LISS POLLOCK, VANDESANDE & PRIDDYSTE 8001990 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs and data processors for analyzing and processing electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic data | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |