USPTO serial 74401146
NISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S. Johnson
DOUGLAS S JOHNSON133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigarettes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |