USPTO serial 74402073
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lewis F. Gould, Jr.
LEWIS F GOULD JR ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT1700 MARKET ST STE 3232PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | tire dressings; rust preventives and removers; polymer protectants; polymer removers; chrome and metal polishes; road tar and oil removers; vinyl restorers; combustion chambers cleaners; carburetor cleaners; automatic choke cleaners; degreasing concentrates; brush cleaners; and trisodium phosphate-type cleaners; soaps; detergents; concrete and masonry cleaners; lemon oil cleaners; toilet bowl cleaners; furniture cleaners; liquid laundry detergents; liquid fabric softeners; powdered laundry detergents; solid dishwashing detergents; liquid dishwashing detergents and carpet cleaners | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | air fresheners; carpet deodorizers | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | automotive cleaning products; namely, brushes of all kinds for washing, scrubbing and polishing automobile finishes; household cleaners; namely, brushes and mops of all kinds for washing, scrubbing and polishing floors, walls, windows, carpets and tiles | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |