USPTO serial 74402321
EC2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EC2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dickerson M. Downing
JANET DORE Morgan & Finnegan Transition Team3 World Financial CenterNew York, NY 10281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, skin and hair care products; namely, perfume, cologne and toilet water, solid and liquid skin, toilet and deodorant soap; eye, facial and foundation makeup and makeup remover; eye and eyebrow pencils; lipstick, lip gloss and lip liners; cleansing creams, skin cleansing lotions, emollients moisturizers, toners and clarifiers; hair conditioners, bleaching preparations, all purpose cleaning preparations, color removers, hair dressing, dyes, gels, lighteners, relaxing preparations, rinses, sprays, straightening preparations, styling preparations; namely, nail enamel, polish, polish base coat, polish removers, enamel removers, hardeners, buffing preparations; and bath oils, salts and bubble bath | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |