USPTO serial 74402698
APROGENEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APROGENEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederic M. Wilf
FREDERIC M WILF ELMAN WILF & FRIED20 W THIRD STP O BOX 703MEDIA, PA 19063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | diagnostic reagents for clinical and medical laboratory use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |