USPTO serial 74404161
STARS II
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 1997
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STARS II?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Feeding Hills, MA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Feeding Hills, MA
SPRINGFIELD, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Peter Nicolai
Paul Peter Nicolai NICOLAI LAW GROUP, P.C.4 E Central St #2840Worcester, MA 01613-2840United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software licensed to audio/visual programming and signal disseminating/displaying operations, namely, television stations and cable channel programming providers for use in scheduling programming and advertising and billing for advertising time and production services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WIDEORBIT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named STARS II
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |