Drawing for COTTON TAILS

USPTO serial 74406130

COTTON TAILS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COTTON TAILS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip P. Mann

PHILIP P MANN REINHART, BOERNER, VAN DEUREN, ET AL1000 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3186UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cotton swabs for personal use and cotton puffs for cosmetic purposesABANDONED—
021cotton ballsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 8, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 1996EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 24, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 18, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 18, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 26, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance