USPTO serial 74407519
PREFERRED PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREFERRED PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen O'Keefe Ward
MAUREEN O WARD STEPTOE & JOHNSON1330 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1795UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | insurance services; namely, underwriting group health and dental insurance and administration of managed health care plans and networks, including HMO's, preferred-provider organizations and exclusive provider organizations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |