USPTO serial 74407575
WATERFRONT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATERFRONT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard G. Stephens
ONE MARINE MIDLAND PLZTHIRD FL E TWRBINGHAMTON, NY 13901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | periodic publications; namely, magazines and special insert sections to newspapers containing items of interest respecting environmental, political, economic, legal and legislative news and views relating to the interface between land areas and water-covered areas which abut each other, including news and views respecting problems, such as wind, water, salt, corrosion, tides and storms, which said areas experience and solutions therefor, news and views respecting persons and organizations important in or to said areas, botany and biology of said areas, advertising or services, equipment and materials useful in such areas, and advertising of area sites for sale or lease | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |