Drawing for STREET HOCKEY

USPTO serial 74407685

STREET HOCKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STREET HOCKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Grant

STEPHEN L GRANT TWIN OAKS ESTATEOLDHAM, OLDHAM & WILSON CO LPA1225 W MARKET STAKRON, OH 44313

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing for men, women and children, namely shirts, crew shirts, turtleneck shirts, mock turtleneck shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweaters, vests, T-shirts, tank tops, socks, caps, ties, and footwear, namely athletic shoesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 21, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 16, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1995REINREINSTATED—
Apr 11, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance