Drawing for RED BALL JETS

USPTO serial 74408128

RED BALL JETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1994302Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 20, 1996
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RED BALL JETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES L. VANA

JAMES L VANA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwearSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 31, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 20, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 11, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 24, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 200689AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 21, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2002C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 26, 2002815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 8, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 13, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance