Drawing for PLAN ON IT!

USPTO serial 74408668

PLAN ON IT!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAN ON IT!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James G. Staples

JAMES G STAPLES BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016white dry erase boards, which include depictions of daily, weekly, monthly, four month and yearly calendars, and depictions of graphs and geographic outlines of the United States, all in the nature of reusable dry wipe boards to record schedules, appointments and other information, all sold in mass retail and office supply outletsABANDONEDSep 15, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 8, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 28, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 13, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 13, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 1995IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 11, 1995AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 28, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 8, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance