USPTO serial 74408668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. Staples
JAMES G STAPLES BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | white dry erase boards, which include depictions of daily, weekly, monthly, four month and yearly calendars, and depictions of graphs and geographic outlines of the United States, all in the nature of reusable dry wipe boards to record schedules, appointments and other information, all sold in mass retail and office supply outlets | ABANDONED | Sep 15, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |