USPTO serial 74408885
CLINCHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLINCHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Makous
DAVID N MAKOUS LEWIS, D'AMATO, BRISBOIS & BISGAARD221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and parts therefore, and computer peripherals; namely, monitors, and video controllers; disc, tape and optical drives and controllers; floppy drives and controllers; hard drives and controllers; modems; input/output boards; networking boards and accessories; add-on boards; terminals; printers and printing accessories; storage buffers; power backups; cables, scanners; computer chassis; power supplies; keyboards; computer programs recorded on magnetic disc media; namely, operating systems and data communication programs | ABANDONED | Jan 7, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |