USPTO serial 74409193
INVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 1997
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEWARK, CA, US
NEWARK, CA, US
Foster City, CA, US
Foster City, CA, US
NEWARK, CA, US
Foster City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica M. Mendez
Jessica M. Mendez ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, computer utility software and computerized X-ray machine employing computed tomography for use in industrial applications in the detection of concealed objects, images, or defects | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MORPHO DETECTION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MORPHO DETECTION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by InVision Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InVision Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GE INVISION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by InVision Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |