USPTO serial 74409689
Serial No. 74409689
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74409689?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75019 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON12, PL DE L'ARGONNE, 75019 PARISFRANCEGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | leather and imitation of leather and goods made of these materials; namely, vanity cases sold empty, shopping bags, back packs, double sacks, satchels, "squaramouth" (reinforced bag), trotteurs (small bags), drawstring pouches, bucket bags, dressing cases, trunks and travelling bags, suit cases, flexible suit cases including a hanging wardrobe, belt pouches (fanny packs), wallets, credit card cases, checkbooks cases, bank note cases, parking card cases, purses, key cases, calling card cases, identity card cases, passport cases, brief case type portfolios, belt in form of banana | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |