USPTO serial 74409805
LORAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LORAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY O DIX
NANCY O DIX GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and playthings, namely board games, card games, computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely discs and computer game cassettes and interactive computer game cassettes, video game cartridges and video game machines, television games, interactive multimedia games and toys produced for sale or distribution in tangible or electronic form including CD-Rom, cartridges, laser technology, floptical disk and all other electronic means of storage and dissemination of information, stuffed toy animals, plush toys, character figures, mechanical and electrical action toys, musical toys, jigsaw puzzles, puppets, character dolls, ride-on-toys amusement park rides, virtual reality games or rides, footballs, baseballs, soccer balls, kickballs, tennis balls, golf balls, basketball, ping-pong balls, softballs, bowling balls, cricket balls, field hockey balls, handballs, volley balls, lacrosse balls, rubber action balls, and rugby balls, bath toys, educational play toys, push toys, and wheel toys | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely classes, workshops, tutorials, and seminars in the field of literacy, and course material distributed in connection therewith, in the nature of interactive CD-roms, books, manuals and games, namely board games, card games, computer game cassettes and disks, video game cartridges and video game machines, and television games; and entertainment services in the nature of amusement parks, production of animated and live children's interactive television shows, production of animated and live entertainment programs for distribution over cable television and computer networks, and the production and distribution of motion pictures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Audrey S. Geisel and Karl ZoBell
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LORAX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |