USPTO serial 74410150
PHYTODERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHYTODERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
DONALD N HUFF WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WSTE 725WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and beauty preparations, namely make-up, perfumes and face and body powders, talcum powders; toilet soaps; face lotions and creams; body lotions and creams to firm breasts, the abdomen and hips | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely medicated skin care preparations featuring vegetable extracts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |